Indiana’s Attorney General Sues 10-year-old Abortionist: During their ongoing dispute on the legality of abortion in Indiana, Attorney General Todd Rokita and abortion physician Dr. Caitlin Bernard have requested that disciplinary actions be taken against each other by the state’s medical licensing board.
Indiana’s Attorney General is Going to Court Against a 10-year-old Abortionist
As part of their ongoing fight over abortion in Indiana, Attorney General Todd Rokita has requested the state’s medical licensing board to discipline abortion physician Dr. Caitlin Bernard. Rokita uploaded a copy of the administrative complaint she filed against Bernard with the state’s medical licensing board on Wednesday. The complaint alleges that Bernard violated federal and state laws about patient privacy and reporting child abuse.
Bernard made public her provision of abortion services to a ten-year-old rape victim from Ohio who had flown to Indiana for treatment in June. Ohio law at the time prohibited abortions after the sixth week of pregnancy. According to a story from October by the Associated Press, a court has temporarily halted enforcement of the prohibition while a legal challenge is considered.
To prevent the attorney general’s office from accessing patients’ medical records and investigating abortion providers, Bernard and her colleague, Dr. Amy Caldwell, filed a lawsuit against Rokita and Scott Barnhart, the director of the consumer protection division of the attorney general’s office, earlier this month.
However, Rokita stated that he would not be reporting Bernard to the medical board for executing an abortion and that his office would not be seeking to reveal anyone’s medical records.
Bernard “failed to maintain legal and Hippocratic obligations by exploiting a 10-year-old small girl’s terrible medical narrative to the press for her interests,” according to a statement made by Rokita on Wednesday. Rokita also claimed that Bernard had violated Indiana law by neglecting to disclose her patient’s abuse.
Rokita stated in court last week that Bernard’s testimony in the continuing litigation proved she “failed to get written authority to disseminate the minor’s medical information” and therefore breached her professional duty as a licensed physician.
“Dr. Bernard’s disclosure of her patient’s maltreatment, medical difficulties, and medical treatment to a reporter at an abortion rights protest to support her political objective was a violation of the law, her patient’s confidence, and the norms for the medical profession. Covering up the patient’s identity isn’t enough to satisfy her moral and legal obligations “Rokita mentioned in the release.
- Senate Votes To Avoid Rail Strike, Denies Railroad Workers 7 Paid Sick Days
- A Judge’s Ruling Leads to Election Certification in One Arizona County
According to a statement released by Rokita, she believes that “only Indiana authorities could have potentially stopped this little child from being returned home to face probable future abuse by her accused rapist.”
While testifying under oath, Bernard insisted that she had followed all applicable laws in reporting suspected cases of child abuse to social workers and state authorities, as confirmed by Bernard’s attorney, Kathleen DeLaney, in a statement to ABC News.
Delaney added that there is written evidence of collaboration between hospital social workers and police enforcement. A guy from Ohio is accused of raping and impregnating a 10-year-old girl, who subsequently sought abortion services in another state, according to the police.
Nonetheless, Rokita also claims in her lawsuit that Bernard failed to disclose the suspected child abuse to authorities. Bernard’s attorney responded by saying that a Marion County assistant prosecutor, Katharine Melnick, testified under oath last week that “in the hospital environment it is social workers, not doctors, who make child abuse referrals to law enforcement.”
Even though abortion is legal in the state, DeLaney stated that Rokita is trying to intimidate abortion doctors. “Mr. Rokita’s filing of the Administrative Action against Dr. Bernard and other abortion doctors today is a last-ditch effort to frighten them. Last week’s hearing evidence and testimony indicated that Dr. Bernard followed all reporting obligations, cooperated with law enforcement personnel, and only discussed a case example in a de-identified form, within the confines of relevant privacy rules “As Delaney put it.