Sen. Warren’s Assertions About Student Loans: Sen. Elizabeth Warren wrote on Twitter that the president has the legal power to wipe out student debt. Twitter fact-checked Sen. Elizabeth Warren’s (D-Mass.) tweet about President Joe Biden’s ability to cancel student debt on Tuesday to give readers more information about her claim.
The Things Sen. Warren Says About Student Loans
Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts indicated in a tweet that the President of the United States does have the authority under the law to cancel student loans.
A fact check was performed on a tweet that was sent out on Tuesday by Senator Elizabeth Warren, who is a Democrat representing the state of Massachusetts. The check was performed to supply users with further information concerning her claim on President Joe Biden’s capacity to forgive student debt.
Warren sent out the following message through Twitter on Monday morning: “Let’s be clear: President Biden has the legal right to erase student debt.” Republican leaders have got to stand aside so that the American people may achieve the relief that they so sorely deserve.
Underneath the tweet, the social media network included an explanation providing some context on the president’s authority on the subject.
On June 14, 2021, an article titled “Can the President Eliminate Student Loan Debt Using an Executive Order?” was published on Politifact.com. Twitter was the first to refer to the article, and it centered on the question of whether or not the president can eliminate student loan debt using an executive order.
“… experts disagree as to whether or not the president may authorize wide debt cancellation (sic) via an executive order,” as stated in the body of the post.
The following can be found in the following paragraph of the article: “It is sufficient of a legal concern that any move by the president would undoubtedly provoke litigation, experts added.”It is sufficient of a legal concern that any move by the president would undoubtedly provoke litigation.”
In addition, Twitter referred to a story that was shown on CBS and highlighted how a federal appeals court had blocked the plan of the Joe Biden administration to erase student debts. The story was about how the plan was delayed.
- Opinion Virginia Shows Our Problematic Gun Relationship
- The Mormon Church Has Come Out in Favor of Same-sex Marriage
According to what was stated in the post, “… in October, in response to an emergency motion, the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals temporarily blocked the student loan forgiveness program…”
It is anticipated that the cost to taxpayers of Vice President Biden’s plan to forgive up to $20,000 in student loan debt for recipients of the Pell Grant and up to $10,000 for others who borrowed using federal student loans will exceed $400 billion. This is because the plan would reduce the maximum amount of debt that could be forgiven from $20,000 to $10,000.
“The extension we’re likely to see is meant to make sure borrowers don’t have the rug pulled out from under them, rather than an indefinite replacement for loan forgiveness.” #CancelStudentDebt https://t.co/dwAPhH9tR2
— Randi Weingarten 🇺🇦🇺🇸💪🏿👩🎓 (@rweingarten) November 16, 2022
Following the announcement made by the administration, several legal challenges against the president’s proposal have been lodged in various courts all around the country to block the idea from going through. On the previous Thursday, a federal judge in Texas issued a ruling that was unfavorable to Biden’s plan in response to a case that had been brought up by the Job Creators Network Foundation.
The foundation is taking legal action in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas because it believes that it should have been allowed to object to the transfer during the period that was set aside for public comment. However, they claim that they were not given this opportunity.
Judge Mark Pittman of the United States District Court noted in an opinion written for the court that it is not the business of the court to judge whether or not the Program reflected acceptable public policy. This statement was made on Monday. “Still, it is impossible to credibly deny that it is either one of the largest delegations of legislative power to the executive branch or one of the largest exercises of legislative power without the authority of Congress in the annals of United States history,” writes the author.
“It is impossible to credibly deny that it is either one of the largest delegations of legislative power to the executive branch or one of the largest exercises of legislative power without the authority of Congress.” “There is no reasonable way to dispute that.”